Sen. Hillary Clinton an artful dodger

WASHINGTON — Slick Hillary? Former President
Clinton earned the nickname “Slick Willy” for his mastery in the
political arts of ducking and dodging. He had a knack for convincing
people on both sides of an issue that he agreed with them.

His wife may not be as smooth, but Sen. Hillary
Rodham Clinton is doing a passable impression of the ever-parsing
former president.

Would she pardon Scooter Libby?

No comment.

Would she nominate a union leader to be secretary of labor?

Maybe.

Would she repeal the North American Free Trade Agreement?

Can’t say.

The Democratic presidential candidate drew
several rounds of applause for her appearance before the American
Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees union Tuesday. She
flashed her sense of humor, displayed a deep knowledge of the issues
and held her own in a forum that pitted her against other presidential
rivals. But what stood out was her reluctance to address questions
head-on.

This habit of hers begs a question: Will the
Clintonian tactic help her in the crowded Democratic field — or hurt
her in the eyes of voters who have grown coarsened by the spin and
obfuscation that marred both the Clinton and Bush administrations?

“It’s obviously a skill that, in the long run,
served Bill Clinton well, and there’s something to say for a politician
who doesn’t alienate people by taking clear positions on issues,” said
Charles Franklin, political science professor at the University of
Wisconsin-Madison. “For Bill, it was certainly a useful skill for
political success.”

But he said the question for Hillary Clinton “is
whether she can pull it off, because it’s certainly not an easy thing
to do successfully.”

She gave AFSCME her best shot.

MSNBC host Chris Matthews asked Clinton at the
labor forum whether former White House aide I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby
should be pardoned.

“Oh, I think there would be enough to be said about that without me adding to it,” she replied.

“That is such a political answer!” complained Matthews.

The largely Democratic audience buzzed,
apparently in protest of Matthews’ response. One audience member told
him to ask a “real question.” Clinton finished the person’s sentence: ”
… a question that’s really about the people in this audience and not
what goes on inside of Washington,” she said.

“So we’ll leave that as a non-answer,” Matthews said.

Clinton 1, Moderator 0.

Libby, the former chief of staff to Vice
President Dick Cheney, was convicted in March of lying to investigators
and obstructing Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald’s inquiry into
the 2003 leak of a CIA operative’s identity. A federal judge said last
week he will not delay a 2 1/2-year prison sentence for Libby in the
case.

Most conservatives want President Bush to pardon Libby. Most Democratic activists don’t.

Indeed, Clinton’s rivals for the Democratic nomination didn’t hesitate to simply reply “no” when asked about a Libby pardon.

It was the same dynamic on trade. Shortly after
Rep. Dennis Kucinich vowed to repeal the North American Free Trade
Agreement, Clinton was asked if she would move to scuttle it.

She dodged. “Like anything,” Clinton said, “NAFTA had some positives, but unfortunately had a lot of downsides.”

Clinton can be specific when she want to be. In
her non-answer on NAFTA, she identified a soon-to-be-closed car plant
by the small Michigan town where it’s located, and she talked in depth
about the link between outsourced jobs and health care costs.

Playing to the union crowd, Matthews asked
Clinton whether she would nominate a union leader as secretary of the
Labor Department. Yes or no? “It’s a great idea,” she said. “I think we
should really consider that.” It wasn’t what you would call a firm
commitment.

Some voters might find it refreshing that
Clinton passed up three chances to pander to liberal Democrats. Being
against Libby, opposed to NAFTA and in favor of giving unions a voice
at the Labor Department are no-brainers in Democratic primary fights.

It may be that she’s looking beyond the nomination.

“I kind of see those things as in keeping with
her effort to paint herself as a more moderate Democrat than her image
as first lady,” Franklin said.

Until recently, Clinton distanced herself from
the liberal, anti-war wing of the Democratic Party on Iraq — a
position that her advisers said was true to her convictions as well as
smart general-election strategy. But, under pressure from activists who
dominate primary and caucus voting, she has steadily edged to the left.

She told the crowd Tuesday that she had been
calling for a troop withdrawal “for some time,” not mentioning that her
rivals have held that position for a longer period. On the other hand,
she said some troops will need to remain in Iraq to contain al-Qaida,
protect Kurds, keep an eye on Iran, protect the U.S. Embassy and maybe
train Iraqi forces.

The answer offered a little something for everybody, for or against U.S. involvement in Iraq. Pretty slick.

___

EDITOR’S NOTE — Ron Fournier has covered politics for The Associated Press for nearly 20 years.

Copyright 2007 The Associated Press. All
rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast,
rewritten or redistributed.

Powered by ScribeFire.

2 thoughts on “Sen. Hillary Clinton an artful dodger

  1. Thats all hillary is a sidestepper. She sidesteps on civil unions too.

    statements at HRC = http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/danielleclarke/CtYR

    By Danielle Clarke USA Vietnam Vet Jun 21st 2007 at 8:45 am EDT

    MY CONCLUSIONS TO WHAT THEIR WORDS REALLY MEAN LEGALLY STANDING.

    Edwards
    “”I believe that couples in committed, long‐term
    relationships should have the same rights,
    benefits, and responsibilities, whether they are straight couples or same‐Sex couples.””

    Edwards above statement, is the only one in the area of
    civil unions i am concerned about. Because straight
    people don’t have to be in long term committed relationships to get married / civil unions.
    However, edwards does want to repeal the DOMA bill
    that the clintons levied on us in the 90’s, which is a
    good thing for edwards.

    Clinton says

    “”I would like to see federal benefits extended to
    same sex couples that meet certain standards.””

    “”I support repealing the provision of DOMA that may
    prohibit the federal government from providing benefits to people in states that recognize same sex
    marriage. “”

    “”I strongly support ensuring people in stable,
    long-term same sex relationships have full equality of
    benefits, rights, and responsibilities.””

    Clintons above three statements have me very concerned
    that she is side stepping in what she says so as not
    to commit to anything officially.

    she would amend the provisions of DOMA in certain
    standards. Her husband and her were the ones who got us DOMA which Barack has wanted to erase ever since
    the clintons had it installed as law. Barack obama
    and john edwards want to repeal DOMA which is good for
    us.

    “Obama is the only candidate who supports long-term,
    same-sex relationships regardless of length of time those couples have been together. In the
    united states no heterosexual couple is ever
    challenged to demonstrate length of relationship in
    order to obtain the privileges of marriage.

    By supporting Barack Obama, you can join me in supporting the candidate who stands for providing
    equal rights to same sex couples–with NO
    qualifications.”

    NOTE: Lastly please send this to your friends who are either gay or lesbian or supporters so they may know the truth of these three candidates.

    Anyway that is the way i see this one issue of civil unions.

    I would love for you to evaluate the “rest” of these three candidates statements below. You will see how Hillary Clinton and John Edwards try to use words which give them room to squeeze out of fulfilling their commitment to all of us in the LGBT community.

    JOHN EDWARDS

    http://a4.g.akamai.net/f/4/19675/0/newmill.download.akamai.com/19677/anon.newmediamill/pdfs/edwards.pdf

    HILLARY CLINTON

    http://a4.g.akamai.net/f/4/19675/0/newmill.download.akamai.com/19677/anon.newmediamill/pdfs/clinton.pdf

    BARACK OBAMA

    http://a4.g.akamai.net/f/4/19675/0/newmill.download.akamai.com/19677/anon.newmediamill/pdfs/obama.pdf

    respectively yours
    Danielle Clarke = Your friend at philapride 6-10-07

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s